Landau counsels clients on the importance of marketing residual capacity

            Even if the claimant’s doctor has not released him/her to go back to work, Doug Landau counsels his clients to put effort into job searching that may fit their current restrictions.   If they do not find employment, there is at least a written record of their efforts as evidence that the injured worker is not malingering, but would seriously like to work.  Waiting for the employer to accept the claimant back to work is not necessarily the best result for the claimant.  ABRAMS LANDAU clients who have sustained permanent arm, leg or head injuries may not ever be able to go back to their old jobs.  BUT, there are other, easier, “light duty jobs,” that they can do.  The Virginia Workers Compensation Commission sometimes calls these jobs “selective duty positions.”  Whether the injured worker has had a broken leg or a brain injury, the Commission will often look to see what efforts they have made to look for light work that they CAN do.  Failure to even look can serve as the basis for an insurance company terminating benefits.

 

            The recent case of  John Quinn Inc. v. Barry   is an example of what is expected and the law in Virginia.  At the time of his accident, an injured employee was working two jobs, one of which was a part-time job at Home Depot.   The claimant could not return to his pre-injury work with his primary employer or any with any manufacturing or construction position.  The claimant accepted a full-time position with Home Depot where his work activities were limited as a result of his injury.  The Virginia Court of Appeals overturned the Commission Award of TPD because the Court was not convinced that the claimant’s acceptance of the full-time position with Home Depot constituted adequate marketing of his residual capacity.  The Court determined that the claimant failed to meet his burden of proof. 

See: John Quinn Inc. v. Barry (Frank, J.)Virginia Court of Appeals No. 2229-07-2, July 15, 2008, Virginia Lawyers Weekly 008-7-333(UP),9pp 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *